Johann Burkard created ISPN-1808: ------------------------------------ Summary: Make InfiniSpan passivation faster Key: ISPN-1808 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1808 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Enhancement Components: Loaders and Stores, Marshalling Affects Versions: 5.1.0.FINAL, 5.1.0.CR4 Reporter: Johann Burkard Assignee: Galder Zamarreño While InfiniSpan is very fast in-memory, once passivation is turned on, things get slow for me. On my i5-2400 with a Crucial C300 SSD, it takes about 11 ms to passivate a 2964 B value. This comes down to a write speed of 250 to 300 KB/s. The disk can write up to 180 MB/s so it's not the bottleneck. Clearly, passivation should be faster than that. Profiling with YourKit shows most of the hot spots are centered around {{FileCacheStore}}, the JBoss Marshalling library and various bucket and {{ImmortalCacheEntry}} methods. Locking also seems to play a role. Here's a screenshot: !http://i.imgur.com/LzkPw.png! To make profiling easier for you, I've taken my test case and turned it into a small Maven project. Simply running {{mvn install}} should run the test, ready for profiling. Of course, it could also be that my configuration is suboptimal. However, in my experiments, many configurations were unusable (hitting the file handle limit), which is not a good thing. The project is available at http://johannburkard.de/resources/Johann/infinispan-performance.zip I've also found one or two other things I think are more costly than they would need to be In {{FileCacheStore}} {code} byte[] buffer = new byte[streamBufferSize]; ... fileInStream = new FileInputStream(file); ... bis = new BufferedInputStream(fileInStream); ... bytesRead = bis.read(buffer, 0, streamBufferSize); {code} wrapping the {{FileInputStream}} in a {{BufferedInputStream}} is unnecessary because you already have a buffer in {{byte[] buffer}}. I think I have seen this before in InfiniSpan, so you might want to check for occurrences of {{BufferedInputStream}} or {{BufferedOutputStream}}. Another one {code} if (bytes.length == 0) { // Short circuit if (f.exists()) f.delete(); return; } {code} {{f.exists()}} is essentially a syscall. Just calling {{f.delete()}} is enough. {code} if (!root.exists()) { if (!root.mkdirs()) { log.problemsCreatingDirectory(root); } } if (!root.exists()) { throw new ConfigurationException("Directory " + root.getAbsolutePath() + " does not exist and cannot be created!"); } {code} This could also be shortened to {code} if (!root.mkdirs()) { throw new ConfigurationException("Directory " + root.getAbsolutePath() + " does not exist and cannot be created!"); } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira