[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Paul Ferraro commented on ISPN-4919:
------------------------------------
One issue that will need to be addressed for server is that undefined attributes of a
given resource have default values. From WF's perspective, this is a requirement of
the management model (i.e. to indicate the assumed value for a given attribute if
undefined). However, this makes the concept of defined vs undefined attributes difficult
to decipher when handling extending configuration. This suggests that we need separate
schema/attribute definitions for base configurations vs extended configurations.
Configuration templates
-----------------------
Key: ISPN-4919
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4919
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Configuration
Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
Assignee: Tristan Tarrant
Currently there is a 1:1 relationship between configuration and named caches. While the
programmatic API does have the ability to .read() an existing configuration to create a
new one, the declarative config does not.
We should introduce the concept of configuration inheritance, e.g.:
{code}
<local-cache name="eviction-cache">
<eviction strategy="LIRS" maxEntries="10000"/>
</local-cache>
<local-cache name="mycache" template="eviction-cache" />
{code}
Possibly, cache templates should be made "abstract" so that they cannot be
instantiated as named caches directly, e.g.:
{code}
<local-cache name="eviction-cache" abstract="true">
...
</local-cache>
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)