]
Dan Berindei updated ISPN-5021:
-------------------------------
Status: Resolved (was: Pull Request Sent)
Fix Version/s: 9.1.0.Alpha1
Resolution: Done
Nodes that finish the rebalance later can see outdated values
-------------------------------------------------------------
Key: ISPN-5021
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5021
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core, State Transfer
Affects Versions: 7.0.2.Final
Reporter: Dan Berindei
Assignee: Pedro Ruivo
Priority: Critical
Labels: consistency, testsuite_stability
Fix For: 9.1.0.Final, 9.1.0.Alpha1
Copied from
[
ISPN-4444|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4444?focusedCommentId=1302...]
If the CH_UPDATE command is delayed on the old owner, the new owners might update the key
without the old owner knowing, and a locality check on the old owner won't help.
I remember one thing that struck me when reading the Raft algorithm was that they install
configuration changes symmetrically, in 3 phases. We might need to do the same for our
rebalance:
1. T0: read_ch=old, write_ch=old
2. start a rebalance
3. T1: read_ch=old, write_ch=old+new
4. new owners have all the data
5. T2: read_ch=new, write_ch=old+new
6. remove old cache entries and ignore further writes
7. T3: read_ch=new, write_ch=new