7:21 a.m.
On 31 Oct 2014, at 22:34, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Max/Fred
Can you please review https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-997344 and
confirm if those ids are ok. If not, do you mind to place the right
information at the document?
sorry for late response.
Looking at this list the only two repositories I consider valid in
production quickstarts are:
redhat-techpreview-all-repository
http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/
redhat-earlyaccess-all-repository (for things not GA)
https://maven.repository.redhat.com/earlyaccess/all/
These are I'm surprised we are now letting in:
Jboss public repo is not something our productized nor project
quickstarts should depend on is it ? Was there not a requirement for
quickstarts
to *not* rely on this repo that is a big mashup of dependencies and
instead only rely on central published artifacts ?
jboss-public-repository
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/
Fuse reposource repo I thought was only being used for old fuse releases
? If that is no longer the case then that is not great since
it seem to have a lot of redundancy of artifacts.
fuse-public-repository
https://repo.fusesource.com/nexus/content/groups/public
This repo I do not understand what is for and should not be exposed
anywhere IMO. Only relevant to put in testers own settings.xml is it not
?
jboss-developer-staging-repository
http://jboss-developer.github.io/temp-maven-repo/
About the ID's correctness/alignment with our tools that is something
Fred should be able to verify better than I.
/max
Pete/Max,
Do you know if Fuse maven repository still valid ?
Thanks
On 10/31/14 11:56, Rafael Benevides wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking about the implementation of the repository definition
> in pom.xml and I want to share my thoughts:
>
> - Create a QSTools CHECKER to mark the lack of <repository /> as a
> guideline violation if MavenCentralChecker is disabled.
> - The violation message will instruct to use the new QSTools GOAL
> that will be created
>
> - Create another QSTools GOAL to setup the repositories.
> - There will be a list of approved repositories and its IDs (redhat
> techpreview, earlyacess, jboss developer temporary, etc)
> - QSTools will remove all previous repositories from pom.xml and
> prompt which repositories should be added.
> - This will help Quickstarts and demos to be easily buildable from
> development and production branches and will also allow this list to
> be bulk updated to remove any previous development repository
> definition.
>
> Please,
>
> If you have any feedback on this, feel free to reply.
>
> --
>
> *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
> JBoss Developer
> M: +55-61-9269-6576
>
> Red Hat
>
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> collaboration.
> See how it works at www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>
>
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/3258288> Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/redhatlatam>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
_______________________________________________
jbossdeveloper mailing list
jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen