Re: [jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml

On 31 Oct 2014, at 14:36, Vineet Reynolds Pereira <vpereira(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org, "Alexandre Porcelli" <alexandre.porcelli(a)gmail.com&gt;, "Tomas Repel" > <trepel(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Nikoleta Ziakova" <nziakova(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:53:43 PM > Subject: Re: [jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml > >> On 31 Oct 2014, at 13:58, Rafael Benevides wrote: >> >> I know which dependencies were causing the build to fail and where to >> find them, but it seems that Alexandre wanted to show users how to run >> a >> project as easy as clone, build and run. >> >> If I'm not wrong, this discussion started with similar issues in this >> Arun Gupta Twitter thread: >> https://twitter.com/arungupta/status/502854638832730112 > > so this is a different question. > > Question is if we should add the techpreview/all to > quickstarts/examples. > > Not about earlyaccess. > > And afaik we already did this for quickstarts with a clear warning, > right ? AFAIK, they're not in the POM of the quickstarts. A settings.xml is supplied instead: https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-wfk-quickstarts/blob/2.6.0.Final... But, that would deflect the original question on whether we should add it to POM. Honestly, I dont mind adding it, with the warning that for a real-world project, the repo should instead be in the settings.xml. > > Thus if ticketmonster does not have that in there I would say it would > make sense to add it > with similar warning/text as the quickstarts. > > /max > >> >> As I also told Alexandre that we were having this discussion, I >> invited >> him to give his feedback on this Thread so he can provide more >> details. >> >> Alexandre, >> >> Do you mind to share your restrictions and perceptions about the build >> process ? >> >> On 10/31/14 06:47, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>> What restrictions does he have ? >>>>> >>>>> And I guess the issue here is ticketmonster master needs the >>>>> earlyaccess bits ? >>>>> >>>>> I think ticketmonster master could add the earlyaccess to its pom >>>>> but >>>>> then just make sure once it is releaesed it gets removed which >>>>> should >>>>> be fine since then it should be using any earlyaccess bundles, >>>>> right ? >>> Not really, ticket-monster master branch doesn't exist. The closest >>> to >>> master is 2.6.0.Final - >>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/ticket-monster/tree/2.6.0.Final - >>> which is the tight to WFK 2.6.0.GA and all GAVs should be resolvable >>> fromhttp://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ >>> >>> I think that Rafael knows that 2.7.x-develop is unstable and includes >>> internal product GAVs which are not in all or earlyaccess. >>> >>> So if Alexandre uses 2.6.0.Final branch/tag he should get it to work >>> just with online redhat repository >>> http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/. If not please >>> advice him to send errors to Vineet or me. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbossdeveloper mailing list >> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > jbossdeveloper mailing list > jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper _______________________________________________ jbossdeveloper mailing list jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper