Re: [jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml

We stopped at which repos should be included. Them in the other email thread I proposed to have a list of approved repos and its id, them QSTools can be used to update those repo definitions. On 10/31/14 15:07, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Anything holding us back for doing it for quick starts and ticketmonster? > > I feel we had this discussion in past but I only remember "just not done > yet" ...or was there something beyond that ? > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > > On 31 Oct 2014, at 17:50, Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> This was only done for the archetypes >> >> On 10/31/14 13:44, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> Didn't we do inject of these when Productization built them ? >>> >>> Or was this only done for the archetypes ? >>> >>> >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> >>> On 31 Oct 2014, at 14:36, Vineet Reynolds Pereira <vpereira(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> To: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> Cc: jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org, "Alexandre Porcelli" < >>>>> alexandre.porcelli(a)gmail.com&gt;, "Tomas Repel" >>>>> <trepel(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Nikoleta Ziakova" <nziakova(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:53:43 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml >>>>> >>>>> On 31 Oct 2014, at 13:58, Rafael Benevides wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I know which dependencies were causing the build to fail and where to >>>>>> find them, but it seems that Alexandre wanted to show users how to >>>>>> run >>>>>> a >>>>>> project as easy as clone, build and run. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I'm not wrong, this discussion started with similar issues in this >>>>>> Arun Gupta Twitter thread: >>>>>> https://twitter.com/arungupta/status/502854638832730112 >>>>>> >>>>> so this is a different question. >>>>> >>>>> Question is if we should add the techpreview/all to >>>>> quickstarts/examples. >>>>> >>>>> Not about earlyaccess. >>>>> >>>>> And afaik we already did this for quickstarts with a clear warning, >>>>> right ? >>>>> >>>> AFAIK, they're not in the POM of the quickstarts. A settings.xml is >>>> supplied instead: >>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-wfk- >>>> quickstarts/blob/2.6.0.Final/settings.xml >>>> >>>> But, that would deflect the original question on whether we should add >>>> it to POM. >>>> Honestly, I dont mind adding it, with the warning that for a >>>> real-world project, the repo should instead be in the settings.xml. >>>> >>>> Thus if ticketmonster does not have that in there I would say it would >>>>> make sense to add it >>>>> with similar warning/text as the quickstarts. >>>>> >>>>> /max >>>>> >>>>> As I also told Alexandre that we were having this discussion, I >>>>>> invited >>>>>> him to give his feedback on this Thread so he can provide more >>>>>> details. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alexandre, >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mind to share your restrictions and perceptions about the >>>>>> build >>>>>> process ? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/31/14 06:47, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What restrictions does he have ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And I guess the issue here is ticketmonster master needs the >>>>>>>>> earlyaccess bits ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think ticketmonster master could add the earlyaccess to its pom >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>> then just make sure once it is releaesed it gets removed which >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> be fine since then it should be using any earlyaccess bundles, >>>>>>>>> right ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not really, ticket-monster master branch doesn't exist. The closest >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> master is 2.6.0.Final - >>>>>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/ticket-monster/tree/2.6.0.Final >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> which is the tight to WFK 2.6.0.GA and all GAVs should be >>>>>>> resolvable >>>>>>> fromhttp://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that Rafael knows that 2.7.x-develop is unstable and >>>>>>> includes >>>>>>> internal product GAVs which are not in all or earlyaccess. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So if Alexandre uses 2.6.0.Final branch/tag he should get it to work >>>>>>> just with online redhat repository >>>>>>> http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/. If not please >>>>>>> advice him to send errors to Vineet or me. >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> jbossdeveloper mailing list >>>>>> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper >>>>>> >>>>> /max >>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbossdeveloper mailing list >>>>> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbossdeveloper mailing list >>>> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbossdeveloper mailing list >>> jbossdeveloper(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper >>> >>