Who does this? Is this something I should be doing? The archetypes are
still using branch 6.2.x. Looks like we missed 6.3.x. :-(
On 09/02/2014 10:53 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
yes. EAP Archetypes should be release together with EAP Quickstart.
It already happens for WFK Archetypes..
Em 9/2/14, 11:50, Sande Gilda escreveu:
> Thanks Rafael. That clarifies things.
>
> I've always been unclear about the Archetype releases. Do they
> coincide with the JBoss EAP release cycle or the JBoss Developer
> release cycle? When do we normally tag and branch? It seems like they
> are tightly coupled to the quickstarts, so should we be tagging,
> branching, and releasing them with the quickstarts?
>
>
> On 09/02/2014 10:38 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>> It was changed on this commit at 11 Feb 2014 for EAP 6.2 :
>>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-archetypes/commit/e9b78e807d...
>>
>> After that I sent several emails asking about the Archetype
>> productization release process and had no replies. So we haven't any
>> archetypes releases (but -build-x) after that as you can see at:
>>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-archetypes/commits/6.2.x-dev...
>>
>>
>> Em 9/2/14, 11:25, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>> Rafael, when where the Archetypes changed? The JBoss EAP 6 Java EE
>>> Web Project doesn't do this in JBoss Tools 3.2.x or JBoss Developer
>>> Studio 7.1.GA.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/27/2014 01:29 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>> We need also to consider that the actual generated project by the
>>>> latests Archetypes already uses <repository /> on its pom.xml.
>>>>
>>>> So I assume that we're already somehow encouraging them to do it.
>>>>
>>>> More inline..
>>>>
>>>> Em 8/27/14, 13:26, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>>>> For our products we have the obligation to keep it for 5 years,
>>>>>> so we already can't change the repo URL. Plus the fact that
our
>>>>>> quickstarts are not available through the Maven Central.
>>>>> don't know where you get 5 years from - they need to be much
longer.
>>>> You're right. If we consider the ELS of some products it can
>>>> easily get more than 10 years!
>>>>> Anyway - I believe for the released runtime pom's we cnanot add
>>>>> the repository urls but for the quickstart examples it is okey
>>>>> because of the usability aspect.
>>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>