Sande,
Sorry for the late reply. I think we can just make use of the branch. I'll
resurrect this if we see any issues.
Paul.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Making updates on the branch has no effect on the tag, so I don't
see
any reason not to use the existing 6.4.x branch.
On 10/22/2015 01:14 PM, Sande Gilda wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am once again resurrecting the discussion about updating README files
> for the JBoss EAP 6.4 quickstarts to fix broken links. The original
> issue is here:
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RHD-722
>
> Dan created this issue for the quickstarts:
>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/issues/1671
>
> This issue was fixed in the 6.4.x branch here:
>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/tree/6.4.x
>
> Apparently
jboss.org still uses this link:
>
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/tree/6.4.0.GA/
> <
https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/tree/6.4.0.GA/cd...
>
>
> We don't generally change the 6.4.0.GA tag after a release. Should we
> tag a new branch with a weil known name for you to use? Or can you use
> the existing 6.4.x branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Sande
>
--
Paul
-----
Paul Robinson
Red Hat Developer Program Engineering (Web Development lead)
JBoss Developer Program (Web Development lead)
Free/busy info:
https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=probinso%40redhat.com&ctz=E...
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors:Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson (US),
Paul Hickey (Ireland)