Mostly, we've split the two projects, to keep the maven bit simple, but there
isn't a hard rule here.
On 16 Jan 2013, at 16:07, Sande Gilda wrote:
I think all of the existing quickstarts that have separate client and
server side artifacts currently split them out with a common parent. But I will defer to
Pete on which is the best approach. :-)
On 01/16/2013 10:10 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a quick question that I think partly comes down to personal
> preference so I wanted to get some feedback on other options.
>
> When developing a quickstart that contains a deployment and a client to
> call the deployment is it preferable to contain this within a single
> maven artefact or split it out with a common parent?
>
> As an Eclipse user provided the client is simple my preference is to
> keep this in a single Maven artefact so when imported into Eclipse it
> will be a single project. As a command line user I also prefer this as
> I don't need two terminal tabs or a change of working directory to
> switch between deploying and running the quickstart.
>
> There a some quickstarts that have to be split up to achieve the
> packaging being demonstrated but I think those have a clear
> justification for doing so.
>
> I understand for IntelliJ users if split with a common parent the sub
> modules are still represented within the parent module so they don't
> experience the three project like in Eclipse.
>
> So overall just looking for some feedback on which direction is preferable.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Regards,
> Darran Lofthouse.
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev