Thanks Pete. The link in the quickstart root directory
/CONTRIBUTING.md file seems to be wrong. :-)
http://www.jboss.org/jdf/about/contributing/
This gives an "Oops! Something's wrong...
On 02/18/2013 04:23 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> The license we recommend people to use in our CONTRIBUTING.md is approved by legal.
>
> On 18 Feb 2013, at 20:48, Sande Gilda
> <sgilda(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Is there a version of the license that has been approved by legal? For
>> example, I noticed some of these have a year, some have a variable
>> '${year}, and some have no year.
>>
>> On 02/18/2013 03:20 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
>>
>>> Inline
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>>> From: "Rafael Benevides" <benevides(a)redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> To: "jdf-dev"
>>>> <jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>>
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 12:56:05 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Quickstarts and Tooling Automation - License
Header
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all.
>>>>
>>>> The License Header check is on the way. But I have some thoughts that
>>>> I would like to share and ask your opinion.
>>>>
>>>> - I'm using the Checkstyle API to verify for the License Header.
Even
>>>> using RegexpHeader, the check is made line by line. " Checks the
>>>> header of a source file against a header that contains a regular
>>>> expression for each line of the source header." (
>>>>
>>>>
http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/config_header.html
>>>> )
>>>>
>>> Gotta ask why you're using the regexp version and not the file version.
I've found the regexp one to be a pain to maintain long term, but I suppose it *can*
less restrictive based on how you craft your rexegp.
>>>
>>>
>>>> - We instruct the users to use some specific headers:
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.jboss.org/jdf/quickstarts/get-involved/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - We also instructs the users to use the following ide
>>>> templates/format but these templates differ from what we propose:
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/jboss/ide-config/blob/master/eclipse/jboss-java-templa...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Some quickstarts comming from other repos have their header
>>>> modified like on this commit:
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jboss-as-quickstart/commit/605d877b38f280a32...
>>> Personally if we're seeing changes like this with a license I'd flag
it and get it fixed.
>>>
>>>
>>>> So I ask you what should be better to use on the quickstarts tools ?
>>>>
>>>> 1 - Make IDE/JDF Site similar and refactor all non-compliant
>>>> quickstarts? (Inflexible)
>>>>
>>>> 2 - Use another plugin
>>>>
http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
>>>>
>>>> that has the feature to include many distinguished and valid headers
>>>> (Less restrictive)
>>>>
>>>> 3 - Manually check if the first lines of the file contains the
>>>> following patterns: "JBoss, Home of Professional Open Source"
and
>>>> "Licensed under the Apache License" (Almost without
restrictions on
>>>> format)
>>>>
>>>> Until what point should we be too restrictive or not for this
>>>> checking ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em 14/02/13 18:25, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> JDF is growing each day. As a consequence, keep the quickstarts
>>>> consistent is becoming a hard work.
>>>>
>>>> To mitigate this and help the maintenance of the quickstart and also
>>>> to help the contributors to see if their quickstarts are ready to
>>>> review, we are planning and starting the development of a tooling
>>>> for quickstart automation.
>>>>
>>>> This tool will make use of some other well know and opensource
>>>> projects like PMD (
pmd.sf.net), checkstyke (
checkstyle.sf.net),
>>>> Maven Enforcer plugin, etc to attend the following requirements:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * Validating quickstart POM files:
>>>> * Check for the License header ( checkstyle headers )
>>>> * Check for proper spacing and Indentation (try checkstyle -
>>>> whitespace rule and indentation rule )
>>>> * Check and verify if all quickstarts are using the
>>>> same/latest BOM versions
>>>> * Verify is it using the standard properties names (We will
>>>> provide the standard properties name)
>>>> * Check for non bom versions (and identify if we should
>>>> create a new BOM)
>>>> * Check javascript and css versions
>>>> * Check for duplicate properties and dependencies
>>>> * Check the pom.xml elements order
>>>> * Create scripts to update versions (quickstart, boms, etc)
>>>> * When a new quickstart is added, if it has a pom.xml file,
>>>> make sure the <module> is defined in one of the following
>>>> profiles: default, requires-postgres, complex-dependencies,
>>>> requires-full, requires-xts, non-maven.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * Validating quickstart README files:
>>>> * Check for the required metadata tags in README (Level,
>>>> Author, Target Product, etc)
>>>> * Verify the quickstart name in the README matches the folder
>>>> name and the project name
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * Validating quickstart source code
>>>> * Check the quantity of comments in the code (evaluate PMD )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * General validation (desired):
>>>> * If a quickstart with a source other than the current
>>>> repository is modified, create an alert of some sort so we
>>>> can notify the upstream repository of the change.
>>>> * When we update a BOM property version in the quickstarts,
>>>> we need to make the same changes in the archetypes.
>>>> * Also, if there is a code fix in the kitchensink or
>>>> kitchensink-ear, we need to make the same fix in the
>>>> archetype code and check other quickstarts based on the same
>>>> archetype to see if they need the fixes applied.
>>>>
>>>> If you have some comments, I will be glad to hear you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> --
>>>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat Brazil
>>>> +55-61-9269-6576
>>>>
>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>> collaboration.
>>>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>
>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev