Generally looking good. You've still got to add the archetypes in, right?
:
* Top Usage heading is still the h2.
* Java EE BOMs should be at 3.0.0.Final
* The names of the BOMs are currently out of whack - Java EE with vs Java EE 6 API BOM -
we should get these the same -> I would propose adding the 6 to the "with"
BOMs, and removing API and BOM from the Java EE 6 ones
* New layout is great
* I would change Minor Releases -> Release
* Maybe center align the download icon?
* Also, I suspect the Runtimes should be the default page, and maybe call it "JBoss
Stacks".
* I think we need better intro text e.g.
JBoss Stacks allows you to easily choose and use a stack of JBoss runtimes, frameworks and
tools. The JBoss BOMs project allows you to easily use your stack of choice. The JDF
plugin allows you to easily add stacks to your project using Forge.
On 25 Jul 2012, at 21:21, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Thanks for your tips Pete. It was really awesome
New release - with your commits rebased :) - to review
http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Brazil
+55-61-9269-6576
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com
Em 25-07-2012 07:26, Pete Muir escreveu:
> On
http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>
>
> * the code samplle indentation is probably wrong, I think it should just be left
aligned.
> * You have a trailing full stop in the code sample
> * Maybe we should experiment with a table for the layout, rather than the accordion?
not sure.
> * the "Description:" is probably redundant, the layout of the page makes it
obvious that it's a description ;-)
> * maybe we should make the Usage h3 or h4, it's a bit distracting right now
> * We've lost the info on plugins needing to be copied in from the BOMs readmes
>
> On
>
http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/runtimes/
>
>
> * I would prefer to present this all in one table, rather than multiple tabs by type
> * We should present newest server first, not last (descending order)
> * Normally the code name of the server goes in parentheses
> * Links to BOMs should open the right accordion/tab
> * I wonder if we should call it "Suggested Runtime" "Suggested
BOM", "Suggested Archetype"
> * Download URL isn't a URL, it's a link. Suggest you change to
"Download" and then use one of the glyphicons for in the table
> * I would like to be able to expand a row, and see all the available BOMs and
archetypes, and also all available versions of said BOMs and archetypes
>
>
>
http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/plugin-jdf/
>
>
> * Something has gone wrong with the markdown, links aren't being correctly
created
> * I'll send a pull with some suggested changes to the README source
>
> On 25 Jul 2012, at 02:24, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>
>
>> Hi ALL
>>
>> After digging the awestruct/ruby/haml world I update the JDF site to read the
jboss-stack yaml file
>>
>> So I created a new section named JBoss Stacks that's what we have been
calling it.
>>
>> This new section contains:
>> - The JBoss boms (from yaml file -
>>
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stack/blob/Beta2/stacks.yaml
>> )
>> - The Runtime matrix (Major Releases, Minor Releases and some Runtime data -
also read from yaml file)
>> - A page about JDF plugin (from README.md)
>> - PLANED: Archetypes data
>>
>> This new section is at
>>
http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>> - I'll thank for any review and just to know: My designer skill is terrible
:p
>>
>>
>> P.S: Pete Muir heard something about "JBoss Stacks" is an overloaded
name. I don't think that we should change it but if someone have any name idea, it
will be welcome.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>> Red Hat Brazil
>> +55-61-9269-6576
>>
>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>> See how it works at
redhat.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev