Here are some ideas about the development environment we discussed on the hangout: IDE: Eclipse works, it's not my choice, but it works and JBDS has some great extensions Issue-tracker: Honestly not sure. JIRA works alright, YourKit is very good. Unfortunately there isn't a good OSS issue tracker that I'm aware of

Static analysis: sonar and co work very well, however, findbugs and PMD have issues with EE especially around serialization Testing: Certainly the Arquillian universe. I think instead of plain unit tests we should push BDD ala spock. For support I believe Arquillian and Byteman make a great duo. I'll have to think about some others, but those are the initial thoughts _______________________________________________ jdf-dev mailing list jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sande Gilda" <sgilda(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Jason Porter" <jporter(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: "jdf-dev" <jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:26:01 PM > Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] developer environment ideas > > > On 12/12/2012 11:59 AM, Jason Porter wrote: >> Here are some ideas about the development environment we discussed >> on the hangout: >> >> IDE: Eclipse works, it's not my choice, but it works and JBDS has >> some great extensions >> >> Issue-tracker: Honestly not sure. JIRA works alright, YourKit is >> very good. Unfortunately there isn't a good OSS issue tracker that >> I'm aware of > A lot of companies use Bugzilla. I know it's not popular here though. I don't understand how anyone can use bugzilla. Maybe if it had a better search, more intuatitve UI, keyboard commands, productivity improvements, VCS integration... sorry, I'm not a bugzilla fan, never have been.

>> Static analysis: sonar and co work very well, however, findbugs and >> PMD have issues with EE especially around serialization >> >> Testing: Certainly the Arquillian universe. I think instead of >> plain unit tests we should push BDD ala spock. For support I >> believe Arquillian and Byteman make a great duo. >> >> I'll have to think about some others, but those are the initial >> thoughts >> _______________________________________________ >> jdf-dev mailing list >> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev >