Ok.
I'll propose a Beta4 format.
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (
www.nitrodesk.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Muir [pmuir(a)redhat.com]
Received: sexta-feira, 03 ago 2012, 12:46
To: Rafael Benevides [benevides(a)redhat.com]
CC: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: BOMs and archetypes for AS 7.0.2
+1
In fact, it would be nice if we could back-link this as well, so if someone selects the
7.1.1.CR1 archetype, they are told to use AS 7.1 or EAP but not EAP 6.0
On 3 Aug 2012, at 15:23, Rafael Benevides wrote:
Answering to jdf-dev list:
This leads me to think that we will need an extra metadata on runtimes that is
recommendedBomVersion and recommendedArchetypeVersion since the recommendedVersion for a
BOM (7.1.1.CR1) should not be valid in a 7.0.2 runtime context (7.0.2.CR2).
Right ?
Em 03-08-2012 08:29, Pete Muir escreveu:
> Hey
>
> Just realised that we should probably only list the Java EE 6 BOM for AS 7.0.2, as
the others were all done for AS 7.1 (so not tested with 7.0.2).
>
> Also, for archetypes, we should probably list the EAR/WAR ones only, and 7.0.2.CR2 is
a good choice.