Thanks Gilda,
Following our IRC chat, I've just corrected the links in Readme file and replaced EIP
by Enterprise Integration Pattern in EIP QS.
Antoine
Le 14 août 2013 à 19:29, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
Understood. :-)
Excellent job on the README files, by the way. They are very descriptive and easy to
follow!
On 08/13/2013 09:39 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> I totally agree about the names Sande, but we just kept the name of Fuse examples. We
could work with Fuse Team to get more descriptive name.
>
> thanks for the feedback
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Le 13 août 2013 à 14:28, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi Antoine,
>>
>> I haven't looked closely yet, but at a brief glance, I would like to see more
descriptive quickstart names. For example, 'cbr' is pretty cryptic. Developers
will not understand it's a Fuse example that demonstrates a content-based router
pattern in Camel. Some of the other quickstarts, like 'jms' need to be named to
distinguish them from the other JMS quickstart in other repositories. You might want to
add a 'fuse' or 'camel' prefix to the names so they're easier to find
in the giant list on the JDF site [1], similar to the DeltaSpike quickstarts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sande
>>
>> [1]
http://www.jboss.org/jdf/quickstarts/get-started/
>>
>> On 08/13/2013 05:12 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Hanneli and I have just finished to refactor Fuse example in JDF quick start
format. You'll find them here :
https://github.com/jboss-fuse/quickstarts
>>>
>>> Your feedback is most welcome.
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>
>