Hi Bruno,
No problem !
Thanks for the feedback !
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Actually we've been quite busy in the testland. After our
release, we
can discuss a proper backlog for auth-utils.
On 2016-04-26, Helio Frota wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Thanks !
>
> But and about the users of keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils ?
>
> (
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-nodejs-auth-utils )
>
> We are going with a mix of "public client" and "confidential"
approaches
?
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
>
> > Try this:
> >
https://gist.github.com/abstractj/4cd2231a472069d8b6f63b4008c74061
> >
> > On 2016-04-25, Helio Frota wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a shell script to use the new introspection path to do token
> > > validation:
> > >
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/2016-April/005869.html
> > >
> > > I'm using public client and by removing :
> > >
> > > KC_CLIENT_SECRET=a-test-client-credental
> > >
> > > The result is:
> > >
> > > {"error_description":"Authentication
failed.","error":"invalid_request"}
> > >
> > > It is possible to use validation token for public clients ?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > keycloak-user mailing list
> > > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> >
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914