Why shouldn't it just fire in that case? That would certainly follow the principle of least astonishment. On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 10:30 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

Well, if the exchange has completed, then it seem quite appropriate to fire the exchange complete listener. Especially if you have logic and/or logging that you want to make sure runs at the end of every request. On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 10:43 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

I can't reproduce this issue with response code handler: import io.undertow.Undertow import io.undertow.server.handlers.ResponseCodeHandler.*HANDLE_403 ** *fun main*() { ** *Undertow.builder*()*.addHttpListener*(*8080, "0.0.0.0"*) **{ *exchange *-> ** *exchange.addExchangeCompleteListener *{ *_, nextListener *-> ** **println**(*">>> Calling listener: [*${*exchange.*requestPath}*]"*) ** *nextListener.proceed*() ** **} ** ** **HANDLE_403*.handleRequest*(*exchange*) ** **}*.build*()*.start*() **}* It works fine, calling listener On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, at 19:30, Brad Wood wrote: > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JIRA-827 > > > Thanks! > > ~Brad > > *Developer Advocate* > *Ortus Solutions, Corp * > ** > E-mail: brad(a)coldbox.org > ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org > Blog: http://www.codersrevolution.com > > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 10:50 PM Brad Wood <bdw429s(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> Well, if the exchange has completed, then it seem quite appropriate to fire the exchange complete listener. Especially if you have logic and/or logging that you want to make sure runs at the end of every request. >> >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 10:43 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> I guess that would work as well, it's maybe a bit weird as in this case the proceed() invocation is a noop, but I think that is ok. >>> >>> Stuart >>> >>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 13:34, Brad Wood <bdw429s(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> Why shouldn't it just fire in that case? That would certainly follow the principle of least astonishment. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 10:30 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> It should probably throw an exception in this case. >>>>> >>>>> Stuart >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 09:06, Brad Wood <bdw429s(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> I have a basic exchange listener configured for testing that simply logs at the end of each request something like >>>>>> >>>>>> exchange.addExchangeCompleteListener((httpServerExchange, nextListener) -> { >>>>>> if (httpServerExchange.getStatusCode() > 399) { >>>>>> CONTEXT_LOG.warnf("responded: Status Code %s (%s)", httpServerExchange.getStatusCode(), fullExchangePath(httpServerExchange)); >>>>>> } >>>>>> nextListener.proceed(); >>>>>> }); >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Is this working as designed? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> ~Brad >>>>>> >>>>>> *Developer Advocate* >>>>>> *Ortus Solutions, Corp * >>>>>> ** >>>>>> E-mail: brad(a)coldbox.org >>>>>> ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org >>>>>> Blog: http://www.codersrevolution.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> undertow-dev mailing list >>>>>> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > _______________________________________________ > undertow-dev mailing list > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev -- Best regards, Ruslan Ibragimov https://ibragimov.by/