[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Pete Muir commented on WELD-301:
--------------------------------
EjbDescriptor is a class in the Weld SPI, not in the EJB spec. The Javadoc says:
"* Gets the local business interfaces of the EJB"
This is, IMO, a clear requirement that the transitive closure of local business interfaces
must be returned, if you feel this isn't clear, I can update the Javadoc to make it
more explicit.
I believe the EJB spec requires that the entire interface hierarchy of the bean class is
considered when locating business annotated @Local or @Remote, not just the immediate
interfaces of the session bean (but I would like this clarified, I'll check with our
EJB team...). If it doesn't, this is a bug in the TCK :-/
ProducerMethod.checkProducerMethod only checked method declarations
in direct implemented interface and not super interfaces
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WELD-301
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-301
Project: Weld
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.GA
Environment: X86/Ubuntu
Reporter: Hong Zhang
Assignee: Pete Muir
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1
I am investigating the deployment failure when running
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.method.definition.enterprise.EnterpriseProducerMethodDefinitionTest.
The deployment failed due to some validation failure in weld RI code. It complains that
produceLightYellowPear method of LightYellowPearTree is not declared in
LightYellowPearTree business interface. But LightYellowTree implements
LightYellowPearTreeLocal which extends from PearTreeLocal which delares the
produceLightYellowPear method.
This seems a weld RI bug to me after stepping into the RI code:
In ProducerMethod.checkProducerMethod, when it's a session bean, it will check for
its implemented interface and super class for whether they declared this business method.
But the problem is it only goes to its direct implemented interface and not the interface
hierarchy. In this case it's true that the LightYellowPearTreeLocal does not declare
this method, but PearTreeLocal which the LightYellowPearTreeLocal extends from does
declare this method. The RI code should be modified to check for the whole interface
hierarchy and not just the direct implemented interface.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira