[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Carlo de Wolf commented on WELD-301:
------------------------------------
EJB 3.1 FR 4.9.7 bullet 3:
• The interface is allowed to have superinterfaces.
EJB 3.1 FR 4.9.7 bullet 5.2:
• A bean class is permitted to have more than one interface. If a bean class has more
than one interface—excluding the interfaces listed below—any business interface of
the bean class must be explicitly designated as a business interface of the bean by
means of the Local or Remote annotation on the bean class or interface or in the
deployment descriptor.
Since both interfaces are annotated with @Local I would consider both interfaces to be
valid local business interfaces.
ProducerMethod.checkProducerMethod only checked method declarations
in direct implemented interface and not super interfaces
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WELD-301
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-301
Project: Weld
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.GA
Environment: X86/Ubuntu
Reporter: Hong Zhang
Assignee: Pete Muir
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1
I am investigating the deployment failure when running
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.method.definition.enterprise.EnterpriseProducerMethodDefinitionTest.
The deployment failed due to some validation failure in weld RI code. It complains that
produceLightYellowPear method of LightYellowPearTree is not declared in
LightYellowPearTree business interface. But LightYellowTree implements
LightYellowPearTreeLocal which extends from PearTreeLocal which delares the
produceLightYellowPear method.
This seems a weld RI bug to me after stepping into the RI code:
In ProducerMethod.checkProducerMethod, when it's a session bean, it will check for
its implemented interface and super class for whether they declared this business method.
But the problem is it only goes to its direct implemented interface and not the interface
hierarchy. In this case it's true that the LightYellowPearTreeLocal does not declare
this method, but PearTreeLocal which the LightYellowPearTreeLocal extends from does
declare this method. The RI code should be modified to check for the whole interface
hierarchy and not just the direct implemented interface.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira