[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-372) Consider whether we should treat AnnotatedClass definitions which do exactly mirror the reflected class definition as an error

[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Pete Muir commented on WELD-372: -------------------------------- Cases like that should be an error. On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: What about the case like: class Foo { Foo(String foo, String bar, String baz) {} } but the AnnotatedType specifies a constructor with only two parameters. Options I see: a) Weld does some magic and calls the third parameter with null (for example) b) Weld errors at runtime c) We detect the error at boot IMO (c) is most friendly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira