[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys...
]
Morten Christensen commented on WELD-521:
-----------------------------------------
Great. I am happy you liked my first try at API design for weld. I am quite used to ANT
and ruby so I think if/unless is cleaner but that is not a problem.
I have also thought a bit more about the enable/disable support. I need the static method
support myself so I am quite happy with this, but maybe other people would also like an
alternative when java system properties can be used instead (it would be trivial to make a
static method that resolves to a java system property but some might want to be able to
specify a java system property directly ?). What do you think?
Introduce a way to exclude classes or packages from scanning
------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WELD-521
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-521
Project: Weld
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API
Environment: Java SE and Java EE + weld
Reporter: Morten Christensen
Attachments: weld-se-ee-passifier.jar
Better support for dual SE and EE applications. I have some weld-using jar's that can
be deployed on a Java EE and work standalone. It is possible to get this to work using
both weld SE and weld EE but it is a pain. F.x. when deployed under glassfish weld will
fail unless I include a few weld SE dummy classes.... Weld should either combine weld SE
and weld EE OR there should at least be some support for having weld ignoring some of my
classes/packages depending on which environment it is running under.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira