]
Pete Muir closed CDITCK-89.
---------------------------
Resolution: Done
Assignee: Pete Muir
TCK on Policy Tests
-------------------
Key: CDITCK-89
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-89
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
Assignee: Pete Muir
Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Hi;
I am currently testing org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.policy.PolicyAvailabilityTest. My
questions are on the following test methods
- testProducerPoliciesOnClass
Sheep is produced by "EnabledSheepProducer" class that is defined in beans.xml
and "NotEnabledSheepProducer" class that is not defined in beans.xml. So the
first assertion in the test is correct
1) assert getBeans(Sheep.class, new AnnotationLiteral<Wild>(){}).size() == 2;
But how the second assertion is correct?
2) assert getBeans(Sheep.class, new AnnotationLiteral<Tame>(){}).size() == 2;
NotEnabledSheepProducer is not defined in beans.xml. So producer field and method that is
contained in this class are disabled.
- testProducerPoliciesOnMethodAndField
CatProducer class defines producer field and method that are annotated with
@Alternative. According to the spec section 5.1.1 "the alternative is a producer
method, field or resource, and the bean class that declares the method or field is listed
in beans.xml". CatProducer class is not defined in beans.xml so those producer beans
must be disabled and must not be used in resolutions.
So the following assertions must be false, because CatProducer class is not defined in
beans.xml
assert getBeans(Cat.class, new AnnotationLiteral<Wild>(){}).size() == 2;
assert getBeans(Cat.class, new AnnotationLiteral<Tame>(){}).size() == 2;
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: