It's not, the attribute definition method would still have to be changed.
But it would no longer be possible to set the attribute value to an empty
string using this expression, isn't that a problem?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:55 PM David Lloyd <david.lloyd(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think the proposed functionality should already mostly be present,
as
you can supply an empty default value. For example "${foo.bar:}" will not
throw an exception if `foo.bar` is missing but rather return an empty
string. Is an empty string sufficient to yield the default value of an
attribute?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:32 AM Michal Petrov <mpetrov(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for feedback on my issue -
>
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5339, analysis document at
>
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-proposals/pull/423
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
--
- DML • he/him