On 2/24/14, 11:04 AM, Harald Pehl wrote:
Am 24.02.2014 um 17:43 schrieb Brian Stansberry
<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com>>:
> On 2/24/14, 10:28 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/24/2014 11:10 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 24.02.2014 um 15:59 schrieb Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com
>>> <mailto:bburke@redhat.com>>:
>>>
>>>> is an admin console for admins, not a user application made for your
>>>> grandma who's using the same old computer and OS version you bought
her
>>>
>>> Actually that is the real problem - it is for admins, that are not
>>> allowed to use
>>> a modern browser because central IT invested X money in to
>>> certifying it with
>>> whatever ridiculous internal stuff they came up with. They do not
>>> want to
>>> re-certify with FFn+1 every 3 weeks because no one will pay them.
>>>
>>
>> Obviously you don't want to require support for the latest and greatest
>> every 3 weeks version, hence "relatively modern". "Relatively
modern"
>> being, I don't know, browsers from 2010? or even 2012? Wouldn't they
>> have this same certification headache with Java 7 or Java 8?
>>
>>> Grand ma on the opposite just needs to call their kids^w local tech
>>> support
>>> to get an update installed.
>>>
>>
>> No, grandma wouldn't even make the connection that she needed to update
>> her browser. She just wouldn't go to that website anymore.
>>
>> FYI, I'm not trying to hijack this thread. Just trying to get input.
>>
>
> Are you saying drop IE8 as well? IE 9 came out in March 2011.
>
> Browser geeks: if gecko1_8 was dropped, what's the earliest Firefox we'd
> support?
>
gecko1_8 is used for *all* Firefox version > 3.0. For FF, Chrome &
Safari GWT does not distinguish between interim versions. Here's the
full list of supported browsers (taken from the latest GWT sources):
https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt/+/master/user/src/com/google/gwt/userage...
Thanks.
So the six browsers are ie6, ie8, ie9, ie10, gecko1_8 and safari. IE10
was the one not on the original email.
> I think Tomaz's proposal to drop IE 6 is a no-brainer.
I take this as a "Yes, remove IE6 permutation from the WF version"
Yes.
.: Harald
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Senior Principal Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
---
Harald Pehl
JBoss by Red Hat
http://hpehl.info
--
Brian Stansberry
Senior Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat