Hi
Would "org.wildfly.ai" be ok as groupId for ai fp ? or should we go to something
more explicit like "org.wildfly.feature-pack.ai" ?
Emmanuel
Le 28/02/2025 à 16:31, Brian Stansberry a écrit :
No, I'd prefer not to go off on a renaming exercise.
The one exception to that is
https://github.com/wildfly-extras/wildfly-grpc-feature-pack,
which has never produced a 1.x release; latest
is 0.1.11. I think a breaking change can be expected in a 0.x release. Harald, if you
agree can you make a note to get that changed before
we do anything that more closely ties that repo to our end users?
Beyond that, if people reading this manage wildfly-extras projects and think a change is
appropriate, let me know what the new groupId
will be. But if you're talking about changing something that may break appserver end
users (e.g. the GraphQL feature pack), let's not. And
if something will need a lot of discussion, let's not. Better things to do. :)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:04 PM Jason Lee <jasondlee(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This all sounds good to me. It would be a breaking change, of course, but
could/should "we" strongly encourage those other repos to
change their group ID?
Jason Lee
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Java Champion
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:30 PM Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Also, no org.wildfly.extras.*.
The wildfly-extras github org is largely meant to serve as an incubating space
for stuff that may at some time move to the wildfly
GH org. So putting 'extras' in the package name is taking something
possibly temporary and putting it into something that's likely
permanent.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 6:06 PM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
+1 I any project outside of the wildfly/wildfly repository should be using a
different groupId.
James R.Perkins
Principal Software Engineer
Red
Hat<https://www.redhat.com/>
<
https://www.redhat.com/>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:53 PM Brian Stansberry
<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Currently we have a number of different repos publishing artifacts using
the 'org.wildfly' groupId with no further
namespacing.
Going forward I don't think we should allow any other new repos to do
that. It leads to administrative hassles, e.g. with
setting things up in Nexus.
Best regards,
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
WildFly Project Lead
He/Him/His
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
Privacy Statement:
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy
List Archives:
https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org/message...
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
WildFly Project Lead
He/Him/His
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
Privacy Statement:
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy
List Archives:
https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org/message...
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
WildFly Project Lead
He/Him/His
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
Privacy Statement:
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy
List Archives:
https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org/message...