Thanks for the very polite hint to read the darn code! :)
On 2/12/14, 12:34 PM, James R. Perkins wrote:
Not sure on the final plans on how to present it, but currently there
is
https://github.com/dmlloyd/wildfly/blob/cf6775eb53204b8bdad4e5cd9d3445bd1...
in the root directory.
On 02/12/2014 10:26 AM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> What's the plan re: item 4 from your post at [1] from last July?
>
> "4) Create a mapping document which shows the mapping from JBAS messages
> to the new codes, which can be used to seed KBs or whatever"
>
> On 2/12/14, 9:50 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> It's right there in the topic. James and I have carried out the change
>> discussed in [1] and elsewhere, and have split all the old "JBAS"
codes
>> into specific "WFLYxxx" codes. The pull request is divided into one
>> commit per Maven module for easier review.
>>
>> I request that every subsystem or component maintainer please review the
>> part of the commit that pertains to their piece, and please post
>> comments on the PR itself [2].
>>
>> In addition, I want to discuss a few cases where modules are using
>> message bundles and loggers from neighboring modules. This is going to
>> become a problem when we do the distribution split-up.
>>
>> Finally, one small matter I want to sort out is that we have several
>> modules which use a project-specific code for IllegalArugmentExceptions
>> that pertain specifically to null parameters, whereas some do not use a
>> code for this case and just throw the exception.
>>
>> My feeling is we should either (a) don't use a code for this kind of
>> thing, or (b) come up with a "common" module or code space+project
code
>> which every project can reuse, so we just have one code that universally
>> means "the parameter can't be null".
>>
>> [1]
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/2013-July/000428.html
>> [2]
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/5906
>>
>