Yes. You may want to alter what I send up slightly to tailor it to your
community, but I'll come up with something that should be simple enough to
tweak.
The Commonhaus PolicyPanda compliance check tool[1] will look for a .github
repo in an org and if there is one will look for GOVERNANCE.md,
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md and CONTRIBUTING.md files.[2] Any of those in that repo
satisfies the requirement for that file in all repos in the org.
Further background:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 1:04 PM Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com>
wrote:
So if we create a .github repo at the root of our organisation we can
do
the same and copy the GOVERNANCE.md you are adding?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 6:56 PM Brian Stansberry via wildfly-dev <
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> wrote:
> I'm pleased to say that both proposals received all positive votes, with
> no negative. So I've merged them and they are not official governance
> policies for the WildFly Commonhaus Organization and for the WildFly AS top
> level project.
>
> Thank you all! This is an important step forward for the project.
>
> In a next step I'll submit PRs to add GOVERNANCE.md files to the
>
https://github.com/wildfly/.github and
>
https://github.com/wildfly-extras/.github repos. These will basically be
> pointers to the documents in wildfly/wildfly-governance that we just
> merged. We need to have a GOVERNANCE.md in each repo, or in a .github
> repository for any GH organization that has such a repo. For WildFly AS
> repos at least we shouldn't repeat the details; just point to
> wildfly-governance which will always hold the currently effective policy.
>
> For maintainers of WildFly AS repos in other GH organizations, please let
> me know how you'd like to proceed adding GOVERNANCE.md files to your repos.
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 3:08 PM Brian Stansberry <bstansbe(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm requesting your vote on the proposed governance documents for the
WildFly
>> Commonhaus Organization and one for the WildFly Application Server top
>> level WCO project.
>>
>> WCO --
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-governance/pull/4
>> WildFly AS --
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-governance/pull/5
>>
>> In my September 17 'Next steps on WildFly Governance' post here I noted
>> PRs. Thank you for your feedback on those. I hope I've answered any
>> questions and I know I've made some small adjustments based on your input.
>> Discussion has been quiet for a bit now, so I think it's reasonable to
>> proceed with a formal approval process starting today, as I mentioned in my
>> previous post.
>> The process is simple, and follows something Commonhaus has done on
>> similar things.
>>
>> To record your opinion, do one of the following on each PR
>>
>> * Approve the PR or react with (:+1:) in the top description box if it
>> looks good to you
>>
>> * Review with Comments or react with (:eyes:) in the top description box
>> if you're "ok" with it (it may not be your favorite.)
>>
>> * If you think it needs discussion or revision
>> * Create a review, add your comments and require changes
>> * Use the +- button to make a suggestion (instead of just adding a
>> comment).
>>
>> We'll record opinions for two weeks. On October 21 I'll tabulate the
>> results.
>>
>> --
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Architect, JBoss EAP
>> WildFly Project Lead
>> He/Him/His
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Architect, JBoss EAP
> WildFly Project Lead
> He/Him/His
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
> Privacy Statement:
https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org/message...
>