It's very similar to the existing commit for WF9/EAP6.3 [1], so if we
want the feature in 8.0.1 we should just merge the open PR to bump the
core schema versions[2] and then backport that commit.
[1]
On 3/19/14, 8:32 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Since this change looks minor, and it comes from a community member I
am
inclined to allow into 8.0.1.
How bad is the conflict for the other change you are referring to Darran?
On Mar 19, 2014, at 5:43 PM, Marek Żupnik <marek.zupnik(a)gmail.com
<mailto:marek.zupnik@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Darran, I understand your point of view, but stable version of 9 will
> be not released tomorrow. Lack of pkcs12 support in 8 is a major
> issue, not to mention that in AS 7 I was able to use this format for
> https private key. I think it will be useful to fix it yet in 8, even
> thought the code with a fix will be thrown away in 9.
>
> I made a pull request with a fix
> (
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/6062). It is up to you what
> you do with it.
>
> Thank you for your answers and clarifications.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Marek Zupnik
>
>
> 2014-03-18 18:10 GMT+01:00 Darran Lofthouse
> <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com <mailto:darran.lofthouse@jboss.com>>:
>
> I will have another look if I get a chance to get something into 8 but
> in reality a related change in this area (that completely
> conflicts with
> your changes) was pushed to 9 as the consensus was we did not want the
> configuration model in this area changing before WildFLy 9.
>
> On 18/03/14 16:30, Marek Żupnik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank You Brian for your comments. I'll try to apply them to my
> code. I
> > ask if I will have further questions about it.
> >
> > @Darran, I have a question for you. I wasn't looking into
> development
> > branch so I haven't known about the changes. Is it possible that
> pkcs12
> > support will be merged in Wildfly 8? If not, could my change be
> merged
> > earlier? Otherwise, I'm forced to maintain my version of Wildfly
> untill
> > no 9 will be released.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Marek Zupnik
> >
> >
> > 2014-03-18 16:20 GMT+01:00 Brian Stansberry
> <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com>
> > <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com
> <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com>>>:
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > Welcome!
> >
> > I'm going to make a few comments on github re: some minor
> details of
> > your commit. But please keep an eye on this list for your
> more general
> > question about whether this is how we want to go about this.
> I believe
> > Darran Lofthouse was planning some work in this area so he
> may have some
> > input.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Brian Stansberry
> > Senior Principal Software Engineer
> > JBoss by Red Hat
> >
> > On 3/18/14, 8:59 AM, Marek Żupnik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm Marek Zupnik. It's my first message for this list but
for
> > some time
> > > I've been keeping my eyes on what's happening in wildfly
> development.
> > >
> > > I'm writing regarding to the issue about lack of support
> for PKCS12
> > > keystores in security realms
> > > (
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2229). I wanted to
> migrate my
> > > system to Wildfly but in my case it is a blocking issue.
> I have
> > to use
> > > keystore in PKCS12 format in which I'm storing, among
> others, https
> > > private key.
> > >
> > > I forked Wildfly on github and made a simple fix for this
> issue which
> > > consists in additional parameter "keystore-type" for
keystore
> > > configuration. Based on this parameter I'm able to create
> appropriate
> > > keystore type.
> > >
> > > Config sample:
> > > <keystore path="keystore.p12"
> relative-to="jboss.server.config.dir"
> > > keystore-password="xxx"
keystore-type="PKCS12"
> alias="https"/>
> > >
> > > The changes are in my fork on github (keystore_type branch):
> > >
https://github.com/mzupnik/wildfly/tree/keystore_type
> > >
> > > Before I will try to do push request, could you answer me
> if it is
> > > acceptable solution according to your architecture
> concept? If not,
> > > could you give me some tips how to resolve it in other way? I
> > care about
> > > this fix before 9. release.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Marek Zupnik
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev