So in terms of the requirements analysis:
On 6/10/16 9:24 AM, Emmanuel Hugonnet wrote:
Some details on the current implementation :
* the add-content will overwrite existing content so there is no update-content
updating instead of just adding means having the state on the client as well as on the
server which would require more checks to keep those
in sync for no real value from my point of view.
If there is no objection to this, then the requirement should be altered.
* the add-content/remove-content work with a list of contents thus
for an IDE we don't have to create a bunch of ops to upload or delete
each change.
This I think is a nice-to-have requirement. (And yes, I know it already
exists, but if we by some strange chance find horrible problems then it
can be dropped.)
* you can start from an 'empty' deployment and add contents
to it step by step
Yep. This one is in the hard requirements.
Emmanuel
On 10/06/2016 15:38, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Emmanuel Hugonnet has been working on a long requested feature to have
> WildFly support "managed exploded deployments." We have a requirements
> analysis doc for this at
https://developer.jboss.org/docs/DOC-55497 and
> I just wanted to point that out to the list so anyone interested can
> have a look, and comment on this thread or on the document.
>
> A managed deployment is one where the user provided content is copied by
> the server/host controller into its internal content repo and then
> thereafter that copy is what is used. I estimate that 99%+ of all zipped
> deployments in WildFly are managed. With an unmanaged deployment the
> user provides the server with the local FS path to the content and then
> the server directly uses that content. All exploded deployments are
> unmanaged, as we don't support managed yet.
>
> We propose to add 5 new operations to the deployment resource:
>
> explode (to convert and archive deployment to exploded)
> add-content
> update-content
> remove-content
> read-content
>
> There is one "nice-to-have" requirement listed on the doc where I'm
> increasingly thinking it needs to be a hard requirement, so thought on
> this are appreciated:
>
>
> "The explode operation can take an optional path parameter, the value of
> which is a path within the deployment that should be exploded.
> * The use case for this is scenarios like an exploded ear that
> contains an unexploded war, and then the user later wishes the war to be
> exploded.
> * This is much closer to a hard requirement if the nice-to-have
> requirement for recursively exploding is not supported.
> * This operation will fail if the content referred to by the path
> parameter is already exploded or is not a zip file.
> * This operation will fail if any content between the root of the
> deployment and the content referred to by the path parameter is an
> unexploded archive.
> * So,
> /deployment=foo.ear:explode(path=/thewar.war/WEB-INF/lib/thejar.jar)
> would fail if thewar.war hadn't previously been exploded."
>
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Senior Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat