OK thank you for all your input on this task and I think we have enough to
go on in order to proceed with JTA/JTS.
But let's keep this thread open for the XTS support for the feature (we did
have an earlier private email thread with subject "“XTS impact on
suspend/resume” which was inconclusive).
Mike
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> The transaction subsystem is going to have to handle that (with some help
> from the EJB subsystem).
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Michael Musgrove <mmusgrov(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Wolf Fink <wfink(a)redhat.com
wrote:
>>
>>> Also I expect EJB chains working, I mean the following sequences
>>> - remote->EJB (@NotSupported @Supports - no Tx started) -> internal
EJB
>>> (no matter whether called via Local/Remote interface) with @ReqNew or
>>> @Required
>>> - remote->EJB (any Tx started @Supports @Required @RequiresNew
>>> @Mandatory) -> internal EJB (no matter whether called via Local/Remote
>>> interface) @RequiresNew
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about this use-case with a client (no matter whether it is
>>> a standalone app or another server)
>>> - client starts a Tx
>>> - client call EJB1 in Tx which return
>>>
>> - -> start Graceful shutdown
>>>
>>
>> Stuart, how does the EJB subsystem know that there is an outstanding
>> transaction (the EJB call may have enlisted a resource during the call)? Is
>> it our (ie the txn subsystem) responsibility to detect that there is an
>> outstanding transaction and delay the shutdown until it completes or until
>> the shutdown grace period elapses?
>>
>> --> end Graceful shutdown
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> - client call EJB2 in the same Tx
>>> - maybe EJB2 is annotated with @RequiresNew and need to suspend Tx1
>>> and start a new one to succeed
>>>
>>> My expectation and hope is that such scenario is possible to continue
>>> and finish successfully.
>>>
>>> Wolf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Stuart Douglas <
>>> stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Local transaction creation has to be allowed during graceful shutdown.
>>>> e.g. if a web request is in the process of running and it attempts to
start
>>>> a transaction this must be allowed (the core requirement of graceful
>>>> shutdown is that requests that have already been accepted continue to
run
>>>> as normal).
>>>>
>>>> The only case when transactions should be disallowed are remote
>>>> transactions, such as remote EJB and CORBA, which I think should already
be
>>>> dealt with at the respective endpoints (in terms of disallowing new
>>>> transaction creation). I think the main thing that needs consideration
here
>>>> is what to do with EJB requests that would otherwise be rejected that
are
>>>> part of an existing remote transaction. We probably need some way of
>>>> identifying these requests and allowing them to proceed.
>>>>
>>>> Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Gytis Trikleris
<gtrikler(a)redhat.com>
>>>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m in the process of writing an analysis document for
>>>>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/EAP7-459 and need your input.
>>>>> Specifically I’m looking for the list of subsystems which might need
to
>>>>> create new transactions during the graceful shutdown. Normally new
>>>>> transactions would not be allowed then, but this might stop other
>>>>> subsystems to shutdown properly. If such subsystems exist we’ll need
to
>>>>> think of the way how to filter out their requests (e.g. providing SPI
for
>>>>> them).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gytis
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Musgrove
>> Transactions Team
>> e: mmusgrov(a)redhat.com
>> t: +44 191 243 0870
>>
>> Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (US), Paul Hickey (Ireland), Matt Parson
>> (US), Charles Peters (US)
>>
>> Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson (US), Michael
>> O'Neill(Ireland)
>>
>
>
--
Michael Musgrove
Transactions Team
e: mmusgrov(a)redhat.com
t: +44 191 243 0870
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (US), Paul Hickey (Ireland), Matt Parson
(US), Charles Peters (US)
Michael Cunningham (US), Charles Peters (US), Matt Parson (US), Michael
O'Neill(Ireland)