Re: [wildfly-dev] Apache Portable Runtime (APR) in Wildfly

Hi Andy, Thanks for clarifying. Is there off chance a document or a chart with performance metrics comparing NIO in Undertow vs native connectors with respect to SSL? Regards, Peter

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrig Miller <anmiller(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Also, we don't recommend using the native connections anymore. Since EAP > 6.1, we have had an NIO2 based connector that is better than the native > connector, and with EAP 7 we have Undertow (no need to have anything else). > > Andy > > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stuart Douglas < > stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is not >> required when using Undertow. >> >> Stuart >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does >>> Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions >>> about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but >>> nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support goes. A reference to a section in >>> the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not >>> supported is really what I am after. >>> >>> Regards, >>> --Peter >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> wildfly-dev mailing list >>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wildfly-dev mailing list >> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev >> > > > > -- > Andrig (Andy) T. Miller > Global Platform Director, Middleware > Red Hat, Inc. >