That's a very good point.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Petr Sakar <psakar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I would suggest if the user should not do that, then such situation
should be detected and should trigger an error, otherwise user is left in the wild. If it
is allowed, than it should be documented and the order defined
Petr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaikiran Pai" <jpai(a)redhat.com>
To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 5:12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of
precedence
I think what Stuart meant in his mail was that the order is "undefined"
for such cases from an end user point of view. i.e. don't do that, since
we do not guarantee the ordering or such.
-Jaikiran
On Friday 16 August 2013 01:20 AM, Rebecca Searls wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the nature of how this works. I have not found any
information in the documentation about
> the rules under which these 2 files are processed by AS7/WildFly. If MANIFEST.MF is
present is it always processed
> first? Who wins when there are conflicting rules like the one I described?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
>> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:41:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of
precedence
>>
>> Don't do that.
>>
>> Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
>> something we should consider supported behavior.
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>> removes it?
>>> Is manifest.mf processes first?
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
>>>> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>> order of precedence
>>>> If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
>>>> deployment.
>>>>
>>>> Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls
<rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
>>>>> jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>>>> are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev