Re: [wildfly-dev] WFLY-508, JBeret initial review and integration issues

I have also been looking at this today, and there are quite a few things in the code base that worry me about its quality. 1) JdbcRepository seems to save jobs to the database but never seems to actually load them again or remove them? [1]

2) Some things seem to be implemented in a very inefficient manner, using lists when a map or a set would be more appropriate. For example i <https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/jberet-core/src/main/java/or... AbstractJobRepository all jobs are stored in a list, and as a result every operation on the repo is O(n) on the number of jobs. A map would be a far more suitable data structure here. This will be a real problem is a customer is ever trying to scale to even a moderately sized number of jobs and job instances.

3) Thread safety Almost all objects in the code base are mutable (i.e. no use of final), and with a few exceptions most of the code is not synchronized. From what I can see not much thought has been given to thread safety, and looking through the code I think there are quite a few places where there are the potential to have threading issues. e.g. In [2], where a list that is being modified concurrently is returned to the caller. The caller cannot safely use the list, as it may be modified by another thread as it is being iterated. There are other places where I think there are the potential for races, however I don't know the code well enough to be sure.

4) It looks like it has been designed as a standalone project to be embedded into a deployment, and no thought has been given to how to actually integrate it into Wildfly. I know David already mentioned the statics issue, but this is a big problem. e.g. only one jberet.properties will be loaded, so if two applications have different properties files then one will leak into the other app, depending on the current TCCL when the BatchConfig class is first accessed.

Stuart [1] https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/jberet-core/src/main/java/or... [2] https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/jberet-core/src/main/java/or... On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:09 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd(a)redhat.com <mailto:david.lloyd@redhat.com>> wrote: On initial review of JBeret we have noticed a number of issues that need to be addressed. The culmination amounts to a series of questions and observations here: #1) Why did we not choose to just use the RI? In other words, what benefit do we get from JBeret that is not also in the RI? In other, other words, why should we *use* this code instead of the RI at this point in time? #2) Why does JBeret duplicate facilities already present in the WildFly code base and deployer chain - e.g. annotation indexing, reflection indexing, thread management, parsing facilities, etc.? #3) Specific to algorithmic complexity - it appears that jobs are keyed by ID, yet accessed using a sequential search [1] - this does not scale well to large numbers of jobs. Is there no better approach? #4) JAXB seems to be being used to parse XML, which is a departure from all of our other services which expect parsing to be done during deployment processing in a more efficient manner. Is there any better way we can integrate this, preferably not using JAXB? #5) There are a number of resources present that seem inappropriate for the production JAR [2] [3]. Is this intentional? #6) This code base makes extensive use of static state, including static fields that seem not to be adequately protected for thread-safety, and at least one static thread pool [4]. This needs to be fixed, as these kinds of things make embedding difficult or impossible. [1] https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/jberet-core/src/main/java/or... [2] https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/tree/master/jberet-core/src/main/resourc... [3] https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/jberet-core/src/main/resourc... [4] https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/jberet-core/src/main/java/or... -- - DML _______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev _______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev