Sorry, I was mentioning the xml element in the standalone.xml file. Since it looks like
you are trying to configure programtically or using the CLI then we need to find the DMR
property that corresponds to this xml-element, and that could be one you are mentioning.
You really do not need to use property at all, unless the situation is
1) You deployed the JDBC driver jar file, using CLI or programtically. If the driver jar
has jdbc4 service loader mechanism, it loads the jar file JDBC "driver"
automatically.
2) If this deployed jar file has multiple Driver classes, in its service loader file, then
the WildFly has ambuguity to choose the driver. So, this property will define the JDBC
driver name to use.
The above is for when using the Jdbc's Driver class, if you are trying to create the
DataSource or XADataSource class, then when you deploy a JDBC driver as in (1), this
property will define the class to use for creating the data source.
If you want to know all the properties supported for creating a xa-data-source, using
jboss-cli.sh
/subsystem=datasources/xa-data-source=foo:add( <TAB>
or for driver
/subsystem=datasources/data-source=foo:add( <TAB>
so it all comes down to how you are deploying the JAR file, that defines later actions.
HTH
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
Note - the reason I am asking is the ManageIQ folks are going to
create some
UI pages to push JDBC drivers to managed WildFly servers and there is
confusion as to how to specify the XA datasource class name.
Do they set "driver-xa-datasource-class-name" ?
Do they set "xa-datasource-class" ??
Do they set both?
This is for both EAP 6.4 and EAP 7.x (but I believe the model didn't change
between 6.4 and 7.x).
----- Original Message -----
> Ramesh,
>
> When you say "this attribute also defines which one to use..." what is
> "this
> attribute" referring to?
>
> Are you referring to the "driver-xa-datasource-class-name" attribute or
> "xa-datasource-class" attribute (which is the one that Brian thinks is
> really not used)??
>
> Note that I"m not referring to the XML elements (of which there is the one
> "xa-datasource-class") - I'm referring to the DMR model attributes.
>
> BTW: the XML element name vs. the DMR attribute name results in utter
> confusion :) Why is the XML element called "xa-datasource-class" - but
that
> doesn't set the value of DMR attribute "xa-datasource-class" (which is
the
> same name)? Instead it affects the DMR attribute
> "driver-xa-datasource-class-name".
>
>
> --John Mazz
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > 2)if there more than one Driver or Data Source class in the defined
> > module,
> > this attribute also defines which one to use to create the connection
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Quick and dirty answers..
> > >
> > > 1) Yes.
> > >
> > > 2) I believe the xa-datasource-class management attribute on the driver
> > > resources is cruft. The code related to drivers does not use it beyond
> > > storing a value in the model.
> > >
> > > 3) I *think* that relates to the method
> > > java.sql.Driver.jdbcCompliant(),
> > > whose javadoc says:
> > >
> > > "Reports whether this driver is a genuine JDBC Compliantâ„¢ driver. A
> > > driver
> > > may only report true here if it passes the JDBC compliance tests;
> > > otherwise
> > > it is required to return false.
> > > JDBC compliance requires full support for the JDBC API and full support
> > > for
> > > SQL 92 Entry Level. It is expected that JDBC compliant drivers will be
> > > available for all the major commercial databases.
> > >
> > > This method is not intended to encourage the development of non-JDBC
> > > compliant drivers, but is a recognition of the fact that some vendors
> > > are
> > > interested in using the JDBC API and framework for lightweight
> > > databases
> > > that do not support full database functionality, or for special
> > > databases
> > > such as document information retrieval where a SQL implementation may
> > > not
> > > be
> > > feasible."
> > >
> > > > On May 5, 2017, at 12:52 PM, John Mazzitelli <mazz(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a stupid question and two not-so-stupid questions.
> > > >
> > > > 1. I think I know the answer but I really just need confirmation.
> > > >
> > > > Suppose I have this defined in standalone.xml:
> > > >
> > > > <driver name="h2"
module="com.h2database.h2">
> > > >
<xa-datasource-class>org.h2.jdbcx.JdbcDataSource</xa-datasource-class>
> > > > <driver>
> > > >
> > > > Notice it defines the XA datasource class.
> > > >
> > > > I can share this with both a non-XA <data-source> and a XA
> > > > <xa-data-source>, correct? So this is OK:
> > > >
> > > > <datasource jndi-name="java:/foo">
> > > > <driver>h2</driver>
> > > > <datasource>
> > > >
> > > > <xa-datasource jndi-name="java:/bar">
> > > > <driver>h2</driver>
> > > > <xa-datasource>
> > > >
> > > > That's the stupid question.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Here a second question - what is the purpose of both
> > > > "driver-xa-datasource-class-name" and
"xa-datasource-class". The
> > > > weird
> > > > thing is the XML in standalone.xml uses
"xa-datasource-class" but
> > > > that
> > > > seems to be the value of the attribute
> > > > "driver-xa-datasource-class-name"
> > > > -
> > > > what is this xa-datasource-class ATTRIBUTE?
> > > >
> > > > The docs are not clear here:
> > > >
https://wildscribe.github.io/Wildfly/10.0.0.Final/subsystem/datasources/j...
> > > >
> > > > where it says:
> > > >
> > > > * driver-xa-datasource-class-name The fully qualified class name
of
> > > > the
> > > > javax.sql.XADataSource implementation module-slot The slot of the
> > > > module
> > > > from which the driver was loaded, if it was loaded from the module
> > > > path
> > > > profile Domain Profile in which driver is defined. Null in case of
> > > > standalone server
> > > > * xa-datasource-class XA datasource class
> > > >
> > > > 3. Third question - what is this "jdbc-compliant" attribute
used for?
> > > > The
> > > > docs don't indicate what it would actually be used for:
> > > >
> > > > * jdbc-compliant - Whether or not the driver is JDBC compliant
> > > >
> > > > If I am defining a JDBC driver, wouldn't you think it is JDBC
> > > > compliant?
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > > > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > Brian Stansberry
> > > Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer
> > > JBoss by Red Hat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
>