It would be good if the logic can be changed such that any thing other than with extension
jar,war,ear and zip to consider them as file based deployments rather than zip archive
based deployments.
----- Original Message -----
I’ll defer to our deployment processing gurus re the mount question.
As an aside though, for this to work with the deployment-scanner subsystem
we’ll need to add some logic. Right now it would just ignore the file.
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For Teiid project (
http://teiid.org), we typically deploy a .xml or .VDB
> (zip archive) file to define a virtual database artifact. We are planning
> to deliver a feature where a virtual database is written in DDL, for this
> we would like to deploy a file artifact like "foo-vdb.ddl".
>
> I have written deployment processors for it, and added DEPLOYMENT_ROOT
> mounter to recognize the deployment artifact etc, however during the
> deployment scanning, WildFly always looks at anything other than ".xml"
> file as zip archive, or a exploded zip archive, so that it can do VFS
> mount on that file. I would like to add this ".ddl" extension file
exactly
> similar to ".xml" file. Is there any way to achieve this?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ramesh..
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev