I think if we should see what product management thinks about his, in terms of the choice.
Do we have customers on EAP that are demanding this?
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: ssilvert(a)redhat.com
To: "Andrig Miller" <anmiller(a)redhat.com>
Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, "Burr Sutter" <bsutter(a)redhat.com>,
"Brian Leathem" <bleathem(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 1:18:29 PM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
I should have added, I personally have no problem supporting both in
EAP
if that's what we decide to do.
JSF is kind of unique in that for many years there have been two
well-accepted implementations. Both have their strengths and
weaknesses. Neither is going away.
So the upside of shipping both is that we would be the only ones
providing a choice. Developers could even defer their choice of
implementations until after their application is finished. Then pick
the one that runs best for them.
On 7/8/2013 2:50 PM, Andrig Miller wrote:
> My personal opinion on this, is that we should not ship two
> implementations. I know this is in the community, so it doesn't
> cause any issue with support as we don't have to ship both in EAP.
> Having said that, if people in the community adopt MyFaces, and
> then move to EAP, and its not there, its just another thing that
> causes a problem for adoption of EAP.
>
> Andy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: ssilvert(a)redhat.com
>> To: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 11:31:27 AM
>> Subject: [wildfly-dev] Put MyFaces JSF into WildFly?
>>
>> Ever since we switched from MyFaces to Mojarra I've incurred the
>> wrath
>> of MyFaces fans. Regardless of the relative quality of each
>> implementation, we have stuck with Mojarra because it always
>> implements
>> the latest spec long before MyFaces. Now is no exception as
>> Mojarra
>> fully supports JSF 2.2 and MyFaces 2.2 is incomplete.
>>
>> However, with Multi-JSF in place, it is now trivial to ship both
>> implementations and allow the end user to choose which one they
>> like
>> best.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this?
>>
>> Stan
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>