Great. Chatting on IRC will be fine. We should involve Emanuel
Muckenhuber, as he did the single-process wildcard read support we have,
and he likely remembers best the hassles in doing it across processes.
The use case is basically the same one Harald has -- trying to get a
bunch of data in one request. Harald goes further by filtering out
addresses and/or attributes, but it all starts with sucking in lots of data.
On 11/3/14, 12:01 PM, Heiko Braun wrote:
Ok, let's discuss it further. Maybe on irc. I dont fully understand your use case,
but if you explain it further i am confident we can contribute to it.
> Am 31.10.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>:
>
>> On 10/31/14, 1:30 PM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 Oct 2014, at 18:07, Brian Stansberry
<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This would definitely be useful.
>>>
>>> On the server side we already support a wildcard variant of
>>> read-resource. But it only works within a single process, not across
>>> processes in the domain. We've never had time to sort that issue.
I'd
>>> like to see this feature built on a foundation of a proper cross-domain
>>> wildcard read-resource. That will kill two birds with one stone, plus
>>> ensure consistent behavior.
>>
>> glad to hear. we specifically isolated it from the current codebase to explore
the ideas, before merging with existing approaches. Bringing it into the main codebase
would be a task for somebody with a better understanding of the management layer
internals.
>
> Oh. I can't commit to when we'd be able to do multi-process wildcard
read-resource. I was fired up by the possibility that a talented guy like Harald was
interested. :) This thread certainly raises the visibility of it though. I'll be
thinking about how to do it.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Any other ideas for a name for this? "Map / reduce" to me implies a
much
>>> broader set of functionality, and I wouldn't want to falsely advertise,
>>> nor burn an operation name that we may want later.
>>
>> the name describes quiet well what's actually happening behind the scenes,
but I agree that "map/reduce" is quiet overloaded these days and might lead to
false expectations.
>>
>>> That also relates to
>>> Stan's point in his response, re: this being an element in a broader
>>> query feature. If it has a precise name that implies a narrow scope, if
>>> later on there is a broader feature that broader feature can co-exist
>>> with its ancestor.
>>>
>>>> On 10/31/14, 10:35 AM, Harald Pehl wrote:
>>>> TL;DR
>>>>
>>>> For management clients it is tedious and awkward to read resources /
>>>> attributes in big domains (e.g. return the state of all running servers
>>>> across all hosts which are part of server group "foo"). Today
this
>>>> requires to setup multiple composite operations *on the client* which
>>>> need to be executed in a specific order. This proposal suggests a new
>>>> operation which collects all relevant information *on the
>>>> server* and returns only the relevant data in one go to the client.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------
>>>>
>>>> # Background:
>>>>
>>>> In the admin console we often need to read specific attributes across a
>>>> domain or across a deeply nested resource:
>>>>
>>>> - List all enabled data sources of the current profile
>>>> - Show the port offset of all running servers across all hosts
>>>> - Get all users which belong to role Operator
>>>>
>>>> Even for small domains with two server groups and a small number of
>>>> servers this procedure is awkward and error prone. What makes it even
>>>> more difficult is the asynchronous nature of the admin console. Soon you
>>>> end up in a deeply nested callback-hell. Besides that these
'queries'
>>>> lead to poor performance for big domains with tens of groups, hosts and
>>>> servers.
>>>>
>>>> # Proposal / Prototype
>>>>
>>>> The GitHub repository at [1] contains a more detailed description of the
>>>> problem statement and a working prototype. This includes details such as
>>>> how to address the requested resources, how the information is retrieved
>>>> and how to handle errors.
>>>>
>>>> The proposal also includes a way to filter and reduce the resources
>>>> against a list of attributes and values *before* the response is sent to
>>>> the client.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
https://github.com/hpehl/map-reduce
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Harald Pehl
>>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>>>
http://hpehl.info
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brian Stansberry
>>> Senior Principal Software Engineer
>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Senior Principal Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat