I'm not following very close the development of WF9, but I have a simple
question, the log shows now WFLYSRV0025 instead of JBAS015874 ?
Jorge Solórzano
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Brian Stansberry <
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 7/24/14, 5:03 PM, Frank Langelage wrote:
> When using current WildFly build from sources I see this message after
> startup is complete:
> 24.07. 21:12:26,131 INFO [org.jboss.as#done]
WFLYSRV0025: WildFly
> 1.0.0.Alpha3 "Kenny" started in 28469ms - Started 374 of 500 services
> (179 services are lazy, passive or on-demand)
>
> Two things I suppose to be changed:
> 1. version is now the version of the underlying core, but version of the
> server should also be shown, or not? May be something like "WildFly
> 9.0.0-Alpha-SNAPSHOT based on WildFly Core 1.0.0.Alpha3" ?
IMHO it should just be the version of the full dist, with the core
version only shown if whatever mechanism we add for letting a dist-based
on core control this isn't implemented by a particular dist.
Right now I assume we have no mechanism to let dists based on the core
control this.
> 2. the nickname "Kenny" already was used for WildFly 8.x. Time to create
> a new one for 9.0.x, or?
Please, let's drop code names!!! It's just another thing to screw up.
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Senior Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev