Re: [wildfly-dev] How to deal with resource refs when deploying JPA container managed entity managers (WFLY-2841)

JPA Entity class enhancing/rewriting needs to occur in an early deployment phase (before the application classloader is used to load the enhanced classes). If the ResourceReferenceProcessor ran early enough, the hint wouldn't be needed as a workaround. There are other "if only we did things differently" involved as well. For example, when using the Hibernate Bootstrap spi to start the persistence unit, if we moved references to the datasource to only be in the second deployment phase, that would also help (when using Hibernate). This is not the only case like this. There is also implicit CDI support which uses the application classloader too early (leaving the application deployer to choose whether to use CDI in entity listeners or JPA class enhancing/rewriting). @DataSourceDefinition are also not available until Phase.INSTALL, so they cannot be used with applications that expect entities to be enhanced/rewritten. IMO, we should address these problems in the standards (EE specs). If we can improve our deployment implementation to better deal with these "initialize me first if you want correct behaviour" situations, all the better. On 01/31/2014 09:03 AM, Eduardo Martins wrote: > IMHO this hint should not be needed, a PU referencing a java:comp or java:module datasource is already a hint that the PU will need a resource bound by another component bundled in same jar/war. > > By the way I’m not really a fan of using java:comp in a PU, it sets an dependency on a EE component, and that doesn’t seem right. Wouldn't be preferable to use the original java:jboss/datasources/ExampleDS JNDI name, or use an ear and define a java:app bind at application.xml, to be shared by all modules and components? > > —E > > > On 31 Jan 2014, at 13:13, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Great, thanks for reporting the issue Martin! Great to bring more >> awareness of the deployment problem and workaround. >> >> Scott >> On 01/31/2014 08:04 AM, Martin Andersson wrote: >>> Thanks a lot! >>> >>> I can confirm that the app works now. >>> >>> Br, >>> Martin Andersson >>> Java EE developer at www.purplescout.se <http://www.purplescout.se> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com >>> <mailto:smarlow@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Arjan, >>> >>> Great catch! Your change and adding an persistence unit hint that the >>> persistence unit doesn't need to be started early: >>> >>> <property name="wildfly.jpa.twophasebootstrap" value="false"/> >>> >>> Helps the deployment succeed. >>> >>> It looks like ResourceReferenceProcessor is running during the >>> Phase.POST_MODULE deployment phase, so we need to add a hint to the >>> persistence.xml, that helps the persistence unit deploy later. >>> >>> [6] >>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/ee/src/main/java/org/jboss... >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> On 01/31/2014 06:25 AM, arjan tijms wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I looks like there's one bug in the example. >>>> >>>> jboss-web.xml defines jdbc/MyDS >>>> >>>> But persistence.xml references java:comp/env/MyDS >>>> >>>> Shouldn't the last one be at least java:comp/env/jdbc/MyDS? >>> Regardless, >>>> even with matching names it indeed doesn't work. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Arjan Tijms >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com >>> <mailto:smarlow@redhat.com> >>>> <mailto:smarlow@redhat.com <mailto:smarlow@redhat.com>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> WFLY-2841 reports a deployment failure that occurs when a >>> deployments >>>> [1] persistence.xml, tries to use a resource reference [2] >>> for the >>>> datasource [3]. The error [4] mentions an unresolved >>> (DataSource) >>>> service dependency that is added to the persistence unit >>> service [5], >>>> instead of resolving the resource reference (and using the >>> underlying >>>> DataSource). >>>> >>>> How should we handle resource references for this case? Is >>> there a way >>>> to resolve the resource reference directly from deployers? >>> Or do we >>>> represent the resource reference as a service? >>>> >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> [1] test app is at https://github.com/umartin/wfds/ >>>> >>>> [2] jboss-web.xml >>>> <jboss-web> >>>> <context-root>/wfds</context-root> >>>> <resource-ref> >>>> <res-ref-name>jdbc/MyDS</res-ref-name> >>>> <res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type> >>>> >>>> <jndi-name>java:jboss/datasources/ExampleDS</jndi-name> >>>> </resource-ref> >>>> </jboss-web> >>>> >>>> [3] persistence.xml pu def >>>> <persistence-unit name="wfdsPU" transaction-type="JTA"> >>>> <jta-data-source>java:comp/env/MyDS</jta-data-source> >>>> </persistence-unit> >>>> >>>> [4] {"JBAS014771: Services with missing/unavailable >>> dependencies" => >>>> >>> ["jboss.persistenceunit.\"wfds-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war#wfdsPU\".__FIRST_PHASE__ >>>> is missing >>>> >>> [jboss.naming.context.java.module.\"wfds-1.0-SNAPSHOT\".\"wfds-1.0-SNAPSHOT\".env.MyDS]"]} >>>> >>>> >>>> [5] >>>> >>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/jpa/core/src/main/java/org... >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> wildfly-dev mailing list >>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org> >>> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> wildfly-dev mailing list >>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hälsningar, >>> Martin Andersson >>> Purple Scout AB >>> +46 732 05 14 01 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wildfly-dev mailing list >> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev >