Re: [wildfly-dev] Using feature packs for custom distributions
As I see it the main issue with using core or servlets is the fact that we have to
redefine modules.
Currently AFAIK when pulling in a feature pack you end up pulling in all modules for that
feature pack even if you disable subsystems/extensions that rely on those modules. Would
it not be better to have individual subsystems define what modules they require and only
pull in the required modules for the enabled subsystems/extensions? That would allow us to
build on WF full and get all module definitions from there, while still reducing the size
of our distribution.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomaž Cerar" <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com>
To: "Jason Greene" <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>
Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, "keycloak dev"
<keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, 13 July, 2015 2:53:26 PM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] Using feature packs for custom distributions
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Jason Greene < jason.greene(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
> For our use-case this would also be addressed by wildfly providing a
> feature-pack definition that’s somewhere between servlet-feature-pack and
> full-feature-pack - as long as it contains datasources support, and jaxrs
> support …
I think this is a good idea, to skip optional deps.
Should we add another feature pack "wildfly-web" that would be near EE web
profile?
We could only have feature pack without corresponding distribution.
This would allow downstream projects like keycloak to easier build custom
distribution using such feature pack.
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev