Re: [wildfly-dev] package name change a good idea?

We never said we are going to be renaming existing packages. Especially because we don't want to break compatibly or make back porting harder. What we did agree on is that new stuff should be in new package names. Old packages could be renamed only when the got some big upgrade/change that would break compatibility anyway. -- tomaz On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Are you sure a package name change is a good idea? Won't it make it > harder to pull/push changes upstream and downstream? And create > additional work for those who already are the bottleneck in the release > process? What does Fedora/RHEL do? > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > wildfly-dev mailing list > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev > _______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev