Re: [wildfly-dev] package name change a good idea?
We never said we are going to be renaming existing packages.
Especially because we don't want to break compatibly or make back porting
harder.
What we did agree on is that new stuff should be in new package names.
Old packages could be renamed only when the got some big upgrade/change
that would break compatibility anyway.
--
tomaz
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Are you sure a package name change is a good idea? Won't it make
it
harder to pull/push changes upstream and downstream? And create
additional work for those who already are the bottleneck in the release
process? What does Fedora/RHEL do?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.5 KB)