Re: [wildfly-dev] Deployment unit runtime-name - must it have a packaging type suffix?

In context of this[1] forum thread, is runtime-name expected/mandated to include even the packaging type suffix (.war, .ear etc) or can it be any name? For example, for a deployment foo.war, is it valid to have it deployed with a runtime-name "bar"? Or should it be bar.war? What's happening in this case is that there are deployment unit processors which identify the "type"[2] of the deployment based on the deploymentUnit.getName() and in the absence of the suffix, end up not recognizing the type of the deployment unit which then cascades into issues like the one in that thread, where the WEB-INF/classes isn't added as a resource root to the module of the deployment unit, since it wasn't considered a WAR type deployment. [1] https://developer.jboss.org/thread/276899 [2] https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/undertow/ src/main/java/org/wildfly/extension/undertow/deployment/ WarDeploymentInitializingProcessor.java#L46 -Jaikiran _______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev