Thanks James! I've sent a PR to restore the previous version.
I'll be checking some more cross-project dependency requirements next weeek.
On 12 August 2017 at 01:08, James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It looks like it came in as part of
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7908. I'm personally not a big fan of
these sweeping version updates like this for this exact reason. We've had
issues with this type of thing before and I do think we need a better
approach.
IMO we can definitely downgrade this. I also see no other modules that
depend on it either.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that the Apache Avro version included in WildFly was
> upgraded to 1.8.1.
>
> This breaks Hibernate Search. It wasn't caught by automated
> integration tests as this aspect wasn't covered by integration tests
> within the wildfly codebase - we have them within Hibernate.
>
> A quick grep on the module definitions doesn't reveal any other user,
> and "git blame" seems to suggest it was updated just for the sake of
> updating some components.. so I'm guessing there is no other
> stackeholder I should align with?
>
> 1# Could we please revert it to 1.7.6, which is what Hibernate Search
> requires?
>
> Alternatively we'll need some ad-hoc coding on Hibernate Search and a
> new version respin - with all associated risks - just for the sake of
> updating this.
>
> 2# What can we do to prevent such things in the future?
>
> I can of course contribute some more integration tests but it's never
> going to be enough: there will always be more tests "upstream". Could
> we rather agree on some improved communication process when you all
> consider updating an indirect dependency?
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
>
> -
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9221
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat