Re: [wildfly-dev] package name change a good idea?
Tomaz,
On 8 May 2013, at 16:58, Tomaž Cerar <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Paul Robinson <paul.robinson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Personally, I'd only want to use org.wildfly for new projects where I'm starting
from scratch. I just don't feel the rename buys you enough, to warrant the cost of
harder back-porting and more complex history.
what do you mean "for new projects"? there is only one project named wildfly.
Ah ok, I see. By new projects, I was thinking of replacements for existing pieces.
Undertow sprung to mind as it replaced JBossWeb (?). However, I see that is under
"io.undertow".
we renamed application server not community.
or in short org.wildfly.* should only be used by WildFly project and some small
satellites around it (jandex comes to mind)
Yes, of course. I guess I was thinking that other jboss projects, like transactions, may
like to move to the new package. But I now see that that's wrong.
Paul.
--
Paul Robinson
Web Service Transactions Lead
paul.robinson(a)redhat.com
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane (Ireland), Matt Parson
(USA), Charlie Peters (USA)
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.1 KB)