Re: [wildfly-dev] update on WildFly NoSQL prototype integration...
On 05/12/2016 08:13 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
If OGM should be able to work with connections managed by the
container,
some sort of "neutral" SPI is needed IMO. Otherwise we'd have to create
some sort of abstraction *in* OGM to ensure it still can be used in
other environments than WF.
This makes sense, thanks!
I think best would be to start with a PoC and see things are going to
look like. Then we still can decide where it'd be best located or
whether it's better to avoid re-use and accept some duplication.
+1
2016-05-12 13:24 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org
<mailto:emmanuel@hibernate.org>>:
On 11 mai 2016, at 16:02, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com
<mailto:smarlow@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> Hibernate OGM should still be usable without WF; So maybe there should
>> be a separate project/repo which defines an SPI to obtain/manage
>> connections and implementations for different NoSQL stores?
>
> Excellent suggestion, perhaps the SPI could be under
> https://github.com/jboss, which is a common area for sharing. Possible
> locations for creating the per NoSQL store implementations could be
> https://github.com/jboss or https://github.com/hibernate or
> https://github.com/wildfly.
I'm starting to think that this might be way overkill. If we are
creating a sub project just to share between 20 and 50 lines of code
per provider and the overhead code to abstract property
configuration to plus OGM and WF ones, we are losing more than gaining.
Thoughts ?
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev