It looks ok, and should be part of the main feature pack.
Stuart
Stan Silvert wrote:
Stuart,
This is what I'm thinking for the main module. Does this look correct?
What feature pack should it live in?
<module xmlns="urn:jboss:module:1.3"
name="org.jboss.metadata">
<dependencies>
<module name="org.jboss.metadata.appclient" optional="true"
export="true"/>
<module name="org.jboss.metadata.common" optional="true"
export="true"/>
<module name="org.jboss.metadata.ear" optional="true"
export="true"/>
<module name="org.jboss.metadata.ejb" optional="true"
export="true"/>
<module name="org.jboss.metadata.web" optional="true"
export="true"/>
</dependencies>
</module>
On 8/29/2014 4:38 PM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> No objections here.
>
> Stuart
>
> Stan Silvert wrote:
>> BTW, I don't mean put the resources back. I just mean should we have an
>> aggregation module?
>>
>> On 8/29/2014 1:17 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>> The org.jboss.metadata main module has gone away in WildFly 9. This
>>> used to include all the jboss metadata resources but has now been
>>> broken up.
>>>
>>> However, this breaks the Keycloak subsystem and any other module that
>>> used to reference it as a dependency. Should we restore this module
>>> for backward compatibility?
>>>
>>> Stan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev