On 7 Jul 2017, at 14:22, Heiko Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 6 Jul 2017, at 21:00, Heiko Braun wrote: > Maybe we should change that to support multiple protocol entry points? These could either be custom ones or defined in the spec. For instance rather then having /health, we could introduce /live and /ready. The api underneath however would remain the same. I think only keeping /health and adding a parameter is better, as it "pollutes" less the namespace of urls left to applications.