On 7 Jul 2017, at 14:22, Heiko Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 6 Jul 2017, at 21:00, Heiko Braun wrote:
> Maybe we should change that to support multiple protocol entry points? These could
either be custom ones or defined in the spec. For instance rather then having /health, we
could introduce /live and /ready. The api underneath however would remain the same.
I think only keeping /health and adding a parameter
is better, as it "pollutes" less the namespace of urls
left to applications.
Related issues to improve the spec that are relevant to this conversation.
* Provide different types of health check -
* Health check endpoint should have app name -
JBoss, a division of Red Hat