10:32 a.m.
Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
10:37 a.m.
If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
deployment.
Stuart
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
jboss-deployment-structure.xml
are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
10:51 a.m.
What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml removes it?
Is manifest.mf processes first?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of
precedence
If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
deployment.
Stuart
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
> jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
2:41 p.m.
Don't do that.
Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
something we should consider supported behavior.
Stuart
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com> wrote:
What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
removes it?
Is manifest.mf processes first?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
order of precedence
>
> If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
> deployment.
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
> > jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> > are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
> > _______________________________________________
> > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
>
2:50 p.m.
I'm trying to understand the nature of how this works. I have not found any
information in the documentation about
the rules under which these 2 files are processed by AS7/WildFly. If MANIFEST.MF is
present is it always processed
first? Who wins when there are conflicting rules like the one I described?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:41:55 PM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of
precedence
Don't do that.
Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
something we should consider supported behavior.
Stuart
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> removes it?
> Is manifest.mf processes first?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
> > To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> order of precedence
> >
> > If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
> > deployment.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
> > > jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> > > are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > >
> >
>
10:12 p.m.
I think what Stuart meant in his mail was that the order is "undefined"
for such cases from an end user point of view. i.e. don't do that, since
we do not guarantee the ordering or such.
-Jaikiran
On Friday 16 August 2013 01:20 AM, Rebecca Searls wrote:
I'm trying to understand the nature of how this works. I have
not found any information in the documentation about
the rules under which these 2 files are processed by AS7/WildFly. If MANIFEST.MF is
present is it always processed
first? Who wins when there are conflicting rules like the one I described?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:41:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of
precedence
>
> Don't do that.
>
> Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
> something we should consider supported behavior.
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>> removes it?
>> Is manifest.mf processes first?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
>>> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>> order of precedence
>>> If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
>>> deployment.
>>>
>>> Stuart
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
>>>> jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>>> are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>>
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
6:53 a.m.
So use one or the other but not both. Right?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaikiran Pai" <jpai(a)redhat.com>
To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>,
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of
precedence
I think what Stuart meant in his mail was that the order is "undefined"
for such cases from an end user point of view. i.e. don't do that, since
we do not guarantee the ordering or such.
-Jaikiran
On Friday 16 August 2013 01:20 AM, Rebecca Searls wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the nature of how this works. I have not found
> any information in the documentation about
> the rules under which these 2 files are processed by AS7/WildFly. If
> MANIFEST.MF is present is it always processed
> first? Who wins when there are conflicting rules like the one I described?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
>> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:41:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>> order of precedence
>>
>> Don't do that.
>>
>> Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
>> something we should consider supported behavior.
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>> removes it?
>>> Is manifest.mf processes first?
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
>>>> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>> order of precedence
>>>> If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
>>>> deployment.
>>>>
>>>> Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls
<rsearls(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
>>>>> jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>>>>> are present in an archive? Does one override the other?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
4069
days inactive
4070
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jaikiran Pai -
Rebecca Searls -
Stuart Douglas