Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular-Archive - New Org

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Did not look but I would not be surprised if others do it. At the same time, this proposal is very sensible given the current situation of the Hawkular org. I would not have proposed this if it did not make sense, so whether other orgs do the same is not very important. Keeping 30 repositories in an org with fewer active contributors than repositories makes thinks confusing (priorities, importance, relevance, focus). Rather than taking the drastic step of purging repositories, this is a good approach to still have code that was developed for reference purposes or to restart development if needed. As I said before, marking a repository as 'obsolete' is really strong compared to moving it to a sister org. And letting repositories drop to the bottom does not resolve potential confusion. I see a new org with clear mission a much much better approach. _______________________________________________